TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Sat May 25, 2024 11:24 am

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2816 posts ]  Go to page Previous 169 70 71 72 73141 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:20 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
Why do think McLaren is pushing for Mercedes engines. If they score those Alonso might stay


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:57 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16193
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 945 times
or not, judging by his luck :p

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:18 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/ ... been-taken

Sky sports now also reporting McLaren and Honda are to split. I think there is at least some truth in the rumor.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:48 am 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:27 pm
Posts: 1863
Location: Sneek, Fryslân, Netherlands, Europe, Earth
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 94 times
I can see Alonso signing a one-year deal if McLaren gets supplied by Mercedes, since he probably hasn't got any other option which can guarantee at least some short-term success.

But I'm quite interested in how McLaren will sort this out financially. Regarding the costs you've got Alonso's salary and the payment for Mercedes-engines, whilst they'll lose Honda's huge financial backing and whilst they still don't have any major sponsors.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:28 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 416
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Has thanked: 204 times
Been thanked: 57 times
Unless Fernando is prepared to take a massive salary cut in order to get a reasonably competitive drive?


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
If he's willing to take a paycut and McLaren sticks with Honda he should go to Force India. While I cannot see them fight for the win each weekend I can see him bring that little bit extra to get regular podiums and score a win if everything falls into place (or Spain 2016 situations).


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:35 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:02 am
Posts: 5887
Location: 't Stad
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 620 times
What if Sauber flies next year with the Honda in its back, and McLaren have to admit that maybe their chassis wasn't that great after all, and several factors in its design caused the Hondas to be more vulnerable for flaws?


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:56 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16193
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 945 times
now that Ron Dennis is gone, they can make an effort to get do like IndyCar teams do, using sponsors for one race only

what they did in Indy also could give more visibility to F1 in US, maybe picking more sponsor from there

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:09 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
Omega wrote:
What if Sauber flies next year with the Honda in its back, and McLaren have to admit that maybe their chassis wasn't that great after all, and several factors in its design caused the Hondas to be more vulnerable for flaws?



Would Honda take all the bashing like a little bitch if that was the case? If sauber flies next year it's because they finally fixed their own issues


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 7:01 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:02 am
Posts: 5887
Location: 't Stad
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 620 times
Partypooper


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:19 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 8057
Has thanked: 1465 times
Been thanked: 428 times
Omega wrote:
What if Sauber flies next year with the Honda in its back, and McLaren have to admit that maybe their chassis wasn't that great after all, and several factors in its design caused the Hondas to be more vulnerable for flaws?


I think you've more chance of being struck by lightning whilst sat on your toilet than Sauber have of being competitive with this years Honda engine.

However, it would be sweet irony if Honda were to completely redesign their engine for next year, or perhaps revert to their rumoured big but working mk1 engine, and it actually last a race distance...


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:30 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16193
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 945 times
they should pick one of those 1.6 VTEC engines, put a huge Garret turbocharger and set boost at 4 bar and screw those hybrid crap

fuel mileage will be poor but it'll reach 18000rpm and pole positions all the way

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:34 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:21 am
Posts: 9244
Location: Chile
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 275 times
I just hope they can turn their luck around.

And for F1 to switch back to a more traditional engine formula soon, instead of that nonsense bullshit they have now.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 9:32 pm 
Offline
Founder of the Yaytree
Founder of the Yaytree
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 28263
Location: Birmingham, UK (Not near DEGA :( )
Has thanked: 1306 times
Been thanked: 1873 times
webbsy wrote:
Alright I am starting to really crack the shits at Pirelli now. I have been defending them the whole time they have been in F1 but these tyres are an absolute joke. The softest tyre in the range can last more than half a race distance? Apart from changing tyre pressures they haven't developed these tyres at all.

Oh we don't have testing so can't experiment with the tyres...Bullshit. The reams and reams of data they have they can know what they can do. If they can't then they are incompetent. I've just had enough of them now.


Are you KIDDING?

You know the reason why they made rock hard tyres this year (and the racing quality decreased at a result!) is that fans cracked the shits at them for making tyres that degraded too quickly?
They were asked to make tyres that degraded to improve the show by FOM, they did that, fans bitched, drivers threw them under the bus, negative publicity, teams tried illegal tricks to fix it resulting in Silverstone 2013, they backed off a bit but still made degrading tyres, more driver and fan bitching, Pirelli said "ok, enough of all the negative publicity, you finally get what you want: harder tyres that the drivers can push on"

Races suddenly decrease in quality, fans bitch again.


They really can't win, I have no idea what they get out of the sport when they're met with just wall to wall negativity, and yet every time they're delivering perfectly what they've been asked to do by the powers that be.

_________________
RIP Birmingham Wheels: here's some of the crash videos I recorded when it was there:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIaKIE ... 5t9d5PvoHA

Twitter:

http://www.twitter.com/paulhadsley


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 9:47 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:22 pm
Posts: 93733
Location: New ribs please...
Has thanked: 398 times
Been thanked: 1347 times
I'm surprised Pirelli haven't already quit.


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:12 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 3161
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 337 times
codename_47 wrote:
webbsy wrote:
Alright I am starting to really crack the shits at Pirelli now. I have been defending them the whole time they have been in F1 but these tyres are an absolute joke. The softest tyre in the range can last more than half a race distance? Apart from changing tyre pressures they haven't developed these tyres at all.

Oh we don't have testing so can't experiment with the tyres...Bullshit. The reams and reams of data they have they can know what they can do. If they can't then they are incompetent. I've just had enough of them now.


Are you KIDDING?

You know the reason why they made rock hard tyres this year (and the racing quality decreased at a result!) is that fans cracked the shits at them for making tyres that degraded too quickly?
They were asked to make tyres that degraded to improve the show by FOM, they did that, fans bitched, drivers threw them under the bus, negative publicity, teams tried illegal tricks to fix it resulting in Silverstone 2013, they backed off a bit but still made degrading tyres, more driver and fan bitching, Pirelli said "ok, enough of all the negative publicity, you finally get what you want: harder tyres that the drivers can push on"

Races suddenly decrease in quality, fans bitch again.


They really can't win, I have no idea what they get out of the sport when they're met with just wall to wall negativity, and yet every time they're delivering perfectly what they've been asked to do by the powers that be.


I know that, that's why I said I have been defending them until now. But their effort and apparent lack of any semblance of in season development this year has been pathetic and been my last straw with defending them.

I actually liked the degrading tyres (well not quite to the extreme that the early ones did. The early 2013 spec were good). This years tyres are as hard as they are because they basically said they were playing it cautious because of a lack of data. Well guess what, they now have mountains and mountains of data. So develop and change the compounds for the second half of the season. But they aren't/wont.


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 5:35 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
We need someone to challenge them. That's what they want as well. Hopefully the new owners agree


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:42 pm 
Offline
Eddie Jordan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:52 pm
Posts: 5404
Location: SRD HQ
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 56 times
F1 was better with a tyre war, IMO

_________________
"Many people ask me why I always sign off Till We Meet Again, because goodbye is always so final. Goodbye Dan Wheldon." -Marty Reid


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:31 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:34 am
Posts: 10324
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 396 times
I hated the tyre war, was horrible seeing a team struggling because of something out of their control

_________________
"An idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government"


3x TBKL rFactor Hillclimb champion


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:39 pm 
Offline
Founder of the Yaytree
Founder of the Yaytree
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 28263
Location: Birmingham, UK (Not near DEGA :( )
Has thanked: 1306 times
Been thanked: 1873 times
I think it was good for the sport, each tyre manufacturer had it's own strengths/weaknesses
(Michelin faster but took time to get heat into the tyres and went through an odd graining period that livened up races)

Wet races in particular brought that to the fore, some amazing races were generated because there were different windows of competittiveness between Michelin and Bridgestone.
Brazil 2003 being one, as the Ferarris were overtaken early on, then Rubens came back when his tyres came in leading to quite a lot of passing.

What the FIA are forcing Pirelli to do with the different tyre specs now is basically trying to ape the differences in performance brought by a tyre war.
Bridgestone didn't want to play that game, but Pirelli do.

The only thing the FIA would have to regulate is equal dispensation of teams between each different tyre manufacturer to prevent them making a tyre for 1 team and telling the rest of them to put up with it.
One of the main reasons the Ferrari was so dominant was the exclusive relationship they had with Bridgestone and it's no wonder Williams and Mclaren saw they weren't getting that treatment so jumped to Michelin.

_________________
RIP Birmingham Wheels: here's some of the crash videos I recorded when it was there:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIaKIE ... 5t9d5PvoHA

Twitter:

http://www.twitter.com/paulhadsley


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2816 posts ]  Go to page Previous 169 70 71 72 73141 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited