Not sure I agree with Webber's penalty.

Yes Mark had all 4 wheels beyond the white line, However he only ended up there because Kobayashi didn’t leave him room to remain within the white line.

The rules clarification from a few races ago states that when a driver behind gets his car alongside the one infront while atempting a pass he must me left room, Kobayashi failed to leave him room & this forced Mark to put all 4 wheels over the white line.

I am really confused as to the justification of these rulings. Monza, Vettel squeezes Alonso who is attempting a pass on the outside off the track, Vettel Penalty. Here Koba queezes Webber who is attempting a pass on the outside off the track, Webber Penalty. So because Webber gained an advantage from being pushed off the track, he gets a penalty? I would have thought letting that one go would have been the better decision since Koba broke a (retarded) rule himself. I dunno, the more they try to clarify and tighten the rules the harder they make it for themselves and consistency then slips it seems.

Since the FIA has looked at the telemetry and discovered what we already knew - that Vettel was braking for a corner - does that not put the blame onto Jenson now? Surely the safety car rules are that everybody keeps a steady pace. Although there was not an accident, they were ready to hand out a penalty to Vettel for not holding pace. Now it turns out he did hold pace...which means Jenson didn't. So do the SC rules only apply to leader?

Even though Vettel wasn't penalised, if I were Red Bull I'd be a bit worried about the penalties of recent times. Webbers today was especially harsh.

Blame Jenson!?! Oh dear... for what...

Not sure, but it seems to be not a good idea to be a RBR driver atm... A number of "interesting" decisions made, incl. the "there-is-a-closing-gap-and-i-go-for-it-BANZAIIII!!" of Alonso against Vettel, and yesterday the dumb penalty for Webber and the hearing of Vettel for nothing.

Did you read my post?

They looked into the situation because they thought Vettel slowed too quickly, this not maintaining a sensible speed. After they looked at it they deemed Vettel had not done anything wrong (probably because of the corner they were approaching). So if Vettel hadn't done anything wrong, but the gap had still closed enough for there to almost be an accident, then surely Buttons driving under SC wasn't really appropriate...but we never seen any McLaren representatives get called down to the stewards.

Gap closed. Driver A was thought to be at fault. He was deemed not to be. Surely common sense then says you look at what Driver B was doing. Can't help but feel if it was the other way around, and a Red Bull driver who was second, they'd be looked at. You can maybe claim both of Vettels incidents this year were judgement calls, but Webber was totally screwed in Singapore.

He was beaten by a Force India. I don't really see it as that good.

Tata Tea to sponsor? Tata should have used Tetley.

Don't think there is one to get?

Then why this...?

Then why this...?