TBK-Light.com
https://tbk-light.com/phpBB3/

2013 Random F1 Discussion
https://tbk-light.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=7968
Page 285 of 335

Author:  kals [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Yeah I feel for him. What is the point of being signed as the official reserve driver if you're not going to be used as just that?

Author:  phil1993 [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 6:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

New Jersey, Korea, Mexico gone. Abu Dhabi season finale
http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2013/11/ ... -calendar/

Author:  De Cesaris fan [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 6:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

phil1993 wrote:
Abu Dhabi season finale


Please no. Just no.

Author:  cookie [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 8:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Omega wrote:
I don't see Kovalainen scoring points, he has too little chance to learn the car.


I think you'll be completely wrong judging by Kovalainen's practice pace at the moment. I think he can even score a podium if he has a normal weekend with no penalty's, car trouble or incidents. His pace is very good.

Author:  Artur Craft [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 9:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Even though I don't rate Valsecchi highly, I feel gutted with this.

Kova is impressing, so, going this way, no ride for Davide at Brazil, as he hoped. Poor guy!

Author:  RtN [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

As expected, Quantum still haven't completed the contract.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/111351

Author:  phil1993 [ Sat Nov 16, 2013 8:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Allison & Newey expecting reliability problems in 2014
http://www.f1zone.net/news/leading-figu ... 014/21153/

Seeing as after three years Red Bull still suffers with their KERS, they should be slightly concerned.

Author:  EsbenT [ Sat Nov 16, 2013 1:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

RtN wrote:
As expected, Quantum still haven't completed the contract.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/111351

A decent read on reddit which attempts to explain just who these Quantum people are.

Author:  Gaara [ Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Sounds like the shady Shannon Racing that killed off Forti. Lotus need to steer well clear of this guy or well lose another team.

Author:  siggy [ Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

I'm amazed that if any of that is true, that Lotus hasn't done any research and is simply 'hoping' it's true. If that is the case, they probably need the money more then they let on to believe the public...

Author:  micha [ Sat Nov 16, 2013 4:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Lotus was screwed the moment Danny Bahar got involved. He should have taken the easy route and let Fernandez pay for the use of the name and take the free publicity instead of spending millions Lotus didn't have.

I know this Lotus only shares the name of Lotus cars but it went wrong there. Renault should have picked someone else.

Author:  RtN [ Sat Nov 16, 2013 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Pirelli finally playing hardball over tyre construction.

www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/111378

Author:  RtN [ Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

The money is just 'resting' in his account.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/111384

Author:  Fabs [ Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

RtN wrote:
Pirelli finally playing hardball over tyre construction.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/111378

Oh god, F1 is going to be even worse

Author:  phil1993 [ Sun Nov 17, 2013 5:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Good point here about 2014's power units
http://www.espn.co.uk/blogs/motorsport/ ... 35869.html

Now that's been said, expect 100% reliability :p

Author:  Антон [ Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

The Sun
Image
:lol:

Author:  Artur Craft [ Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

phil1993 wrote:
Good point here about 2014's power units
http://www.espn.co.uk/blogs/motorsport/ ... 35869.html

Now that's been said, expect 100% reliability :p


Nice article and writing style by Kate Walker

Just as an add info regarding 2014 PU. It's been rumoured that during simulations in Barcelona track, the engines provide laptimes 6 seconds slower during the race.

IndyCar, F.R 3,5 and GP2 will fight for "which is the fastest cars of the world?" next year :p

Author:  StanV [ Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Artur Craft wrote:
IndyCar, F.R 3,5 and GP2 will fight for "which is the fastest cars of the world?" next year :p


I'm not entirely sure about the consequences of the 2014-regs, but I suppose the LMP1's should be getting reasonable speeds as well.

Author:  Artur Craft [ Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

Taking each series fastest lap of the race, you have LMP1s being slower than F1s by:

12s in Shanghai
8,5s in COTA
6s in Interlagos (picking F1 data from 2011 race as 2012 was rainy)
10s in Silverstone and Spa

LMP1 will have narrower tyres next year, albeit I don't know if their new PUs will make them faster. I also don't know if they will have any modification in the rules regarding aerodynamics

Besides the engine factor, next year F1s will have some restrictions on aerodynamics(narrower FW, shallower RW) and much lower grip tyres.

Some overall 8s is a good guess I would say in laptime increase.

Are GP2 cars staying the same? I think FR 3,5 will but their engine have only 530HP while GP2's currently have 612. I never heard anything regarding a change on GP2s, so maybe their race laps can be quicker than F1s :p

having said that, no, not gonna happen. They would never allow this to materialize, if the engines would make them this much slower, they would change GP2 cars too to keep F1s faster, simply because there is no logic whatsoever in a lower series being faster than the "pinnacle of motorsport"

Author:  StanV [ Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2013 Random F1 Discussion

For some reason I thought we were just talking speeds rather than full lap quickness. My mistake!

Page 285 of 335 All times are UTC+01:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/