Vettel > Schumacher

But when the Ferrari was failing, Schumacher didn't win either. It took Schumacher and Ferrari years to get the team to the point they could win.

Schumachers talent wasn't particularly as a driver. He was amazing, and an all time great, but in terms of raw skill in normal circumstances, Schumacher wasn't great under pressure, wasn't a great qualifier. He was exceptional in the wet, very very Senna like. But his real talent was building a team around him and having them operate as a unit better than anyone on the grid. It took years to get there, but once they did they were unstoppable. In terms of raw skill, I place Vettel above Schumacher considerably. In terms of the things like building a team, which is something you don't often thing about, Schumacher is so good that nobody is even remotely close to him.

It took Schumacher and Ferrari years to get the team to the point they could win.

Boullier has confirmed that Lotus is talking with Hulkenberg and Maldonado. He appeared to suggest that 'building a team to challenge Red Bull is important, not just for 1 year but 5 years.'

So, money or talent?

Maldonado still has money?

Agree 100%

Vettel proved himself in the past 4 years

he should pick up a greater challenge and race for Ferrari, shut up people who says he wins just because of newey

and of course let other drivers win ffs

Jim Clark only became champion in cars designed by Colin Chapman, Senna only became champion in Gordan Murray cars, Schmumi only won in cars designed by Rory Byrne.

McLaren MP4/6 was Neil Oatley works

but about that issue, I always remember Valentino Rossi, that won his best races in Honda, and then went for Yamaha, winning the first championship for the brand in years. Vettel could do that in F1